February 20, 2008 at 7:18 pm
· Filed under Technology
Though paper-thin, a new nano-material is blacker than black. It is, in fact, 30 times darker than government-issue black, absorbing over 99.9% of all light that comes its way. Apparently the effect can be dizzying to the onlooker; probably because, although the scientists have yet to admit it, it also absorbs neural energy, transferring it to other dimensions where previously unidentified lifeforms eat your positive thoughts.
The new black is darker and more soul-sucking than previously existing shades by several standard deviations. (This image adapted from The Washington Post.)
The project is being coordinated by Amazon’s “artificial artificial intelligence” site called the Mechanical Turk, where people are paid to do all kinds of tasks that computers have not yet mastered, such as transcribing text or identifying items in an image.
The search for Fossett is a volunteer effort, but it should be great publicity for Mechanical Turk. I checked out the site and found myself looking for a quick way to make a buck - literally. For $1 I could do some internet research to identify the artist of a few oil paintings (which proved impossible in one minute of googling, the amount of time I decided was my maximum effort for an unearned dollar). I could also visit a stained glass shop and write a 250+ word article about it, which seemed like it might be fun in a geeky scavenger hunt sort of way. The best part is that you can sign in with your Amazon account (something most of us have already been suckered into starting) and earn some pennies anytime you want.
Sometime when I’m bored, perhaps I’ll find an internet deal for a bargain site for 5 cents, or provide a text transcript of a video for 12 cents. For now, it looks like I should be spending my free time blogging.
Or maybe I can pay someone 50 cents per post to write my blog for me…?
Steve Fossett, millionaire aviation golden boy, left, Sir Richard Branson, Virgin Atlantic billionaire bad boy on the right - two of the least likely people to be found earning money on the Mechanical Turk.
Drinking coffee and exercising may prevent skin cancer. Unfortunately for me, this only works with moderate amounts of caffeine, and they haven’t still come up with Liquid Exercise (although I’m sure someone is working on it, so I italicize to prevent the need for future updating).
Drinking orange juice is good for diabetics, despite its high sugar content. The flavonoids contained in O.J. cancel out the oxidative damage caused by the excess sugar. Unfortunately, orange juice still has plenty of calories, so make sure it’s part of a balanced diet, kids.
Drinking Ovaltine is good for you. Okay, that’s not science news. I was just excited because I finally solved my secret decoder ring.
A new study has found that not all alcoholics are alike, and has identified five subtypes of alcoholics. I’m not sure how they defined an alcoholic in the survey, but the researchers say that many alcoholics are young adults, and that 20 percent of alcoholics are functional and well-educated with good incomes. I would call these two groups 1) college students, and 2) social adults. But then, I’m Irish.
Young Adult subtype: 31.5 percent of U.S. alcoholics. Young adult drinkers, with relatively low rates of co-occurring substance abuse and other mental disorders, a low rate of family alcoholism, and who rarely seek any kind of help for their drinking.
Young Antisocial subtype: 21 percent of U.S. alcoholics. Tend to be in their mid-twenties, had early onset of regular drinking, and alcohol problems. More than half come from families with alcoholism, and about half have a psychiatric diagnosis of Antisocial Personality Disorder. Many have major depression, bipolar disorder, and anxiety problems. More than 75 percent smoked cigarettes and marijuana, and many also had cocaine and opiate addictions. More than one-third of these alcoholics seek help for their drinking.
Functional subtype: 19.5 percent of U.S. alcoholics. Typically middle-aged, well-educated, with stable jobs and families. About one-third have a multigenerational family history of alcoholism, about one-quarter had major depressive illness sometime in their lives, and nearly 50 percent were smokers.
Intermediate Familial subtype: 19 percent of U.S. alcoholics. Middle-aged, with about 50 percent from families with multigenerational alcoholism. Almost half have had clinical depression, and 20 percent have had bipolar disorder. Most of these individuals smoked cigarettes, and nearly one in five had problems with cocaine and marijuana use. Only 25 percent ever sought treatment for their problem drinking.
Chronic Severe subtype: 9 percent of U.S. alcoholics. Comprised mostly of middle-aged individuals who had early onset of drinking and alcohol problems, with high rates of Antisocial Personality Disorder and criminality. Almost 80 percent come from families with multigenerational alcoholism. They have the highest rates of other psychiatric disorders including depression, bipolar disorder, and anxiety disorders as well as high rates of smoking, and marijuana, cocaine, and opiate dependence. Two-thirds of these alcoholics seek help for their drinking problems, making them the most prevalent type of alcoholic in treatment.
Not to make light of alcoholism, but this reminded me of yet another T-shirt:
Science Idol is an editorial cartoon contest for cartoons about science and politics sponsored by the Union of Concerned Scientists. Check out the 12 finalists and vote here(voting closes on July 23, 2007).
Hey blogsters! As you can see by the formula above, Attack of the Monkey is changing format ever so slightly. This is due to my increased project workload. What are these projects, you ask? Well, I’m writing a book, painting, starting an online store, and planning a move. (I’ll keep you posted on the progress of these projects!) So, rather than abandon Attack of the Monkey, as has been the trend of late, I’ve decided to post more often! You ask, how could this possibly work? I ask the same thing myself. But, as you see above, I’ll be posting shorter posts. This makes sense because I often ramble on for far too long. So, I’m hoping that writing less will allow me to post more often. We’ll see how it works!
The directors of the project seem to be making every attempt to avert failure. There are big names involved: E.O. Wilson as the Honorary Chair, Harvard and the Smithsonian, to name a few. There is funding from the MacArthur and Sloan Foundations. And with the announcement of the site comes a You Tube video (below), replete with snappy graphics and glimpses of the smoothly navigable menus characteristic of Web 2.0.
But amidst the fanfare lurk glaring pitfalls. Although some information may be accessible as early as 2008, the site is not expected to be complete for 10 years. The differences between the Encyclopedia of Life and Wikipedia (or “The Encyclopedia of Everything,” as many envision it) are unclear. And, irkingly, the emphasis will initially be on animals, plants and fungi, excluding microorganisms until a later date, and contradicting the “comprehensive guide to living things” idea.
Altogether, however, the encyclopedia is a noble idea that appears well-executed. As long as the scientists, the scientific communicators, the digital archivists, and the general public can cooperate, it just might be what we need to catalog our dying biosphere before it’s (gulp) just a sphere.
Video: You Tube + Web 2.0 + Polar Bears = The Encyclopedia of Life’s recipe for media success.
Scientists have found that the addition of artificial snot enhances the performance of electronic noses. Although they sound futuristic, electronic noses are used for many purposes, including monitoring for spoiled beverages at bottling plants, and detection of pollutants inside space craft. Nasal mucus (aka snot) enhances the sense of smell in our old-school, natural noses by dissolving and separating scent molecules for delivery to scent receptors. Using artificial polymers that mimic actual snot, the researchers were able to distinguish between scents that were previously difficult using the artificial nose, such as milk and cream. What’s next in the artificial body fluid field? Would artificial earwax enhance hearing with fake ears? Could artificial tears make robots, er, sadder? Maybe we should just stick with the snot for now.
Electronic Nose vs. Real Nose Dr. Julian Gardner sniffs out the competition: An electronic nose with artificial snot. A worthy rival, but nothing a few swift sneezes can’t handle.
Here are the top 5 stories that have me sitting in a bunker wearing an aluminum foil hat this week. Thank god for cable internet!
An enormous and bizarre hexagon has been spotted hovering over Saturn’s surface. Scientists are baffled. I’ll wager that it’s an environmentally-engineered biodome for Saturners who survived the prehistoric destruction of the planet’s ecosystem. Inside, they are developing spacecraft and weapons which they will use to steal our planet and suck the living souls from our flesh.
Pulses of yellow light have been shown to reversibly “silence” brain cells. Scientists hope that this technology can be used to treat diseases such as epilepsy and Parkinson’s disease, which are caused by excess neural activity. I don’t buy this whole “yellow light for fighting disease” story. It seems apparent to me that they are developing mind-controlling yellow light laser guns to turn us into zombie cavalry to send to Saturn to annihilate those soul-sucking aliens.
An extremely rare, long-whiskered owl was spotted in the wild for the first time in Peru. The small, strange-looking owl was unknown until 1978 and had previously only been found caught in nets that had been left out at night. Or could it be a genetically-engineered biobot spy, designed to infiltrate conservation circles, converting unsuspecting environmentalists into avid and wasteful consumers?
A new antidepression initiative in England will make computer-based therapy available to the entire population starting in April 2007. Or have the computers finally convinced the health officials that this is a good idea? If I were a computer (clearly bent on global domination), I wouldn’t be trying to cheer these mildly depressed people up. I would be using my supercomputer powers to manipulate the humans to do my bidding by building a massive titanium robot body which I could remotely control to rule London by force. Wouldn’t you?
