Hot and Dangerous, but No Movement on the Political Front

As we slash and burn the Amazon rainforests , we’re working in new ones in Antarctica.  It was reported at a recent conference that invasive grasses have started growing in Antarctica and that trees will likely be next.  Additional gloom and doom from the conference: Antarctic Peninsula air temperatures are rising more rapidly than anywhere else in the world, wind and water current speeds are rapidly increasing, and half of the sea level rise is due to sea water expanding as it warms. 

Closer to home, global warming is affecting everything from wildfires to wine, and the death toll from intensified weather events is rising along with the sea level.

What are our fearless leaders doing to solve this global crisis?  Bickering.  The leaders at the G8 Summit have failed to reach a consensus on the issue.  I wonder who the problem children are?  It’s not a stretch to say that the US is likely difficult to work with on the issue.  And the typical American is more worried about immigration and terrorism (although the energy crisis is becoming an issue and is at least tied to our climate crisis). 

But think of this: If the administration had devoted the same amount of resources to responding to global warming after Katrina as it did “fighting terrorism” after September 11, 2001 then we would be far better off.  Just compare fatalities vs. spending in response.


Fatalities:
Katrina: 1,836; September 11: 2,276
Spending: (This is just a sampling of estimates, but look at the magnitude of difference!)
Terrorism:
Iraq: $300BAfghanistan: $83B ; Homeland Security : $30B (plus 2,650 and counting US casualties)
Climate Change:
Science: $3BEnergy Conservation: $2BRita/Katrina Disaster Aid: $6B (plus 150M Americans living in potential danger zones within 75 km of the coasts!)

It might be easy to say that Katrina is not directly related to global warming, but I’ll counter that by saying that Iraq is not directly related to September 11!  

It is indeed a sad state of affairs that we live in.  What happens next?  If the glass is half empty, we all die from heat or nuclear holocaust.  If the glass is half full, we do something to save the planet now before it’s too late.  I don’t know about you, but I’m a glass-half-full kind of gal.

2 Comments »

  1. Christian said,

    July 19, 2006 @ 12:40 pm

    Defense spending isn’t very good for the planet either. I wonder how much wars are contributing to climate change? All the extra production, transportation, etc?

  2. monkey said,

    July 19, 2006 @ 1:07 pm

    Good point! According to this article, military vehicles use so much fuel that it is expressed in GPM - gallons per mile - rather than MPG!

RSS feed for comments on this post · TrackBack URI

Leave a Comment

Bad Behavior has blocked 78 access attempts in the last 7 days.